EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The Common Priors Assumption

Mark Fey and Kristopher W. Ramsay
Additional contact information
Mark Fey: Department of Political Science, University of Rochester
Kristopher W. Ramsay: Department of Politics, Princeton University

Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2006, vol. 50, issue 4, 607-613

Abstract: In a recent article in this journal, Smith and Stam (2004) call into question the usefulness and applicability of what is know as the common priors assumption in the modeling of countries' strategic behavior in international relations. While the authors of this comment acknowledge that it is possible to incorporate noncommon priors in models of politics in a mathematically consistent fashion, they do not agree with the article's claims regarding the limitations of the common priors approach, which motivate Smith and Stam's rejection of it.

Keywords: war; bargaining; common priors (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2006
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022002706289182 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:jocore:v:50:y:2006:i:4:p:607-613

DOI: 10.1177/0022002706289182

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Conflict Resolution from Peace Science Society (International)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:50:y:2006:i:4:p:607-613