Foreign Aid Versus Military Intervention in the War on Terror
Jean-Paul Azam and
Additional contact information
VÃ©ronique Thelen: Toulouse School of Economics (UT1, ARQADE), Toulouse, France
Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2010, vol. 54, issue 2, 237-261
This article presents a theoretical framework and some empirical results showing that the level of foreign aid received reduces the supply of terrorist attacks from recipient countries, while U.S. military interventions are liable to increase this supply. Due account is taken of endogeneity problems in producing these results. They suggest that Western democracies, which are the main targets of terrorist attacks, should invest more funds in foreign aid, with a special emphasis on supporting education, and use military interventions more sparingly.
Keywords: terrorism; foreign aid; military intervention; education (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (18) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:jocore:v:54:y:2010:i:2:p:237-261
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Journal of Conflict Resolution from Peace Science Society (International)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().