EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Forward-Looking versus Shortsighted Defense Budget Allocation

Ronen Bar-El, Kobi Kagan and Asher Tishler
Additional contact information
Ronen Bar-El: Department of Economics and Management, Open University of Israel, Raanana, Israel, ronenba@openu.ac.il
Kobi Kagan: Department of Economics, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel
Asher Tishler: Faculty of Management, Tel Aviv University, Israel

Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2010, vol. 54, issue 4, 638-662

Abstract: This study presents an analytical model of budget allocation into military and civilian expenditures within an arms race between two rival countries and compares the consequences of shortsighted (period-by-period) planning versus forward-looking (long-term) planning. The authors show that although shortsighted planning is favorable for both countries, they are likely to be locked in a prisoner’s dilemma in which both overinvest in arms procurement. The likelihood of overinvestment in arms procurement is higher when the perceived benefit from security is higher and when future benefits from existing arms stocks are ‘‘high’’; that is, when the rate of technology improvement over time is lower, the depreciation rate of existing arms is lower and the discount factor is higher. A dynamic version of Kagan et al., employing real-world data, finds evidence for the existence of a prisoner’s dilemma in the Israeli—Syrian arms race.

Keywords: arms race; intertemporal defense budget allocation; prisoner’s dilemma; shortsighted planning; forward-looking planning (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022002710361939 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:jocore:v:54:y:2010:i:4:p:638-662

DOI: 10.1177/0022002710361939

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Conflict Resolution from Peace Science Society (International)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:54:y:2010:i:4:p:638-662