Diversion and Political Survival in Latin America

Ross A. Miller and Özlem Elgün
Additional contact information
Ross A. Miller: Department of Political Science, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, rmiller10@unl.edu
Özlem Elgün: Department of Political Science, DePaul University, Chicago, IL

Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2011, vol. 55, issue 2, 192-219

Abstract: In spite of its long history among scholars of international conflict, empirical evaluations of diversionary theory have produced contrasting—even contradictory— results. We offer three reasons for these differences: choice of unit of analysis; failure to model the reciprocal relationship between threats to the survival of political leaders on one hand, and international conflict participation on the other; and measurement error in operationalizations of the independent variable—the incentive of leaders to divert. We construct an empirical test that addresses all of these concerns. Our analysis of data from Latin America during the period 1960-99 reveals robust evidence in support of diversionary theory. The results also expose the biasing effects associated with the failure to control for reciprocal causation and measurement problems.

Keywords: diversionary; conflict; military force; war; political survival (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://jcr.sagepub.com/content/55/2/192.abstract (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:jocore:v:55:y:2011:i:2:p:192-219

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Conflict Resolution from Peace Science Society (International)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().