Naval Power and Effects of Third-Party Trade on Conflict
Ehud Eiran and
Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2021, vol. 65, issue 2-3, 342-371
This study argues that the effect of third-party trade on dyadic conflicts is conditional on the naval power of both the potential conflict initiator and its target state. This conditional effect occurs mainly because naval power allows trade-integrated initiators to reduce their trade dependence on a given trade partner and its allies more easily. At the same time, the targetâ€™s naval power increases the costs that conflict inflict on the initiatorâ€™s trade. As maritime trade accounts for about 80 percent of world trade volume, naval capability has an important effect on combatant statesâ€™ ability to substitute trading partners during a conflict and to mitigate trade-related costs, thereby affecting the relationship between third-party trade and conflict. The findings of our statistical analyses support our theoretical expectation that the pacifying effect of third-party trade diminishes as the initiatorâ€™s naval power increases, yet increases as the naval power of the potential target increases.
Keywords: naval power; third-party trade; conflict (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:jocore:v:65:y:2021:i:2-3:p:342-371
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Journal of Conflict Resolution from Peace Science Society (International)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().