When to Walk Away and When to Risk It All
Scott DeAngelis and
Journal of Sports Economics, 2020, vol. 21, issue 5, 525-547
While one might expect athletes to be strongly averse to extending their career too long when there is a chance of losing everything due to a concussion or a catastrophic injury, experimental subjects consistently played longer than the optimal amount for risk-neutral decisions. A commitment to the length of play in advance, as in the case of long-term contracts, led to a greater chance of staying beyond the expected payoff-maximizing point. If the decision frame is altered so that decisions are made in each period rather than through an upfront commitment, the magnitude of potential losses is more evident.
Keywords: risk; concussion; loss aversion; framing; commitment; long-term contracts (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:jospec:v:21:y:2020:i:5:p:525-547
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Journal of Sports Economics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().