Two Stories, One Power Index

Manfred J. Holler

Journal of Theoretical Politics, 1998, vol. 10, issue 2, 179-190

Abstract: This paper demonstrates that the mathematical properties of the member bargaining power measure (MBP) are identical with those of the public good index (PGI). However, the underlying theoretical concepts of the two measures are different. The MBP refers to bargaining over shares of the coalition value, and thus has a private good perspective, whereas the PGI considers power with respect to providing a public good as coalition value. The identity of the mathematical properties is used to study the properties of the two measures. For weighted voting games, both measures violate monotonicity with respect to voting weights, and the paradox of weighted voting applies.

Keywords: bargaining power measures; nonmonotonicity; public good index; weighted voting (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1998
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0951692898010002002 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:jothpo:v:10:y:1998:i:2:p:179-190

DOI: 10.1177/0951692898010002002

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Theoretical Politics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().