The Properties of Simple Vs. Absolute Majority Rule: Cases Where Absences and Abstentions Are Important
Keith L. Dougherty and
Julian Edward
Additional contact information
Keith L. Dougherty: University of Georgia, dougherk@uga.edu
Julian Edward: Florida International University, edwardj@fiu.edu
Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2010, vol. 22, issue 1, 85-122
Abstract:
Little attention has been paid to the differences between absolute majority rule and simple majority rule, which differ in their treatment of absences and ‘votes to abstain’. This article fills that gap by undertaking a probabilistic analysis of the two voting rules assuming two alternatives and a quorum requirement for simple majority rule. The rules are compared in both a modified sincere setting and a strategic setting using five criteria: (1) the Pareto criterion, (2) the BT criterion (Buchanan and Tullock, 1962), (3) the Expected Social Gain criterion, (4) the Responsiveness criterion, and (5) a modified version of Rae’s criterion. In the sincere setting, we find that simple majority rule (with and without a quorum) outperforms absolute majority rule under most conditions for four out of the five criteria. In the strategic setting, we find that the voting rules perform much more similarly.
Keywords: absolute majority rule; simple majority rule; social choice; voter turnout (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0951629809347557 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:jothpo:v:22:y:2010:i:1:p:85-122
DOI: 10.1177/0951629809347557
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Journal of Theoretical Politics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().