The origins of social institutions

Johannes Urpelainen
Additional contact information
Johannes Urpelainen: Department of Political Science, Columbia University, USA, ju2178@columbia.edu

Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2011, vol. 23, issue 2, 215-240

Abstract: How do individual agents enact the institutions that govern collective behavior in a social situation? How do individuals come to share self-enforcing expectations about collective behavior, so that societal rules and constraints have an effect on individual choice? Conventional accounts, such as contract and evolutionary theories or the analysis of conventions and social conflict, cannot explain the origins of social institutions because they do not address the origins of shared and self-enforcing expectations about collective behavior in a social situation. I analyze two separate stages of institutionalization. First, agents must imagine collective intentionality, so that an ‘imagined institution’ entailing a symbolic representation of collective behavior becomes common knowledge. Second, they must ‘enact’ it through shared and self-enforcing expectations on the path of play. In my model, the agents are goal-oriented, so the process is strategic throughout.

Keywords: game theory; institutionalization; institutions; rationality (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0951629811400473 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:jothpo:v:23:y:2011:i:2:p:215-240

DOI: 10.1177/0951629811400473

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Theoretical Politics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().