EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Strategic party heterogeneity

Georgia Kernell

Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2016, vol. 28, issue 3, 408-430

Abstract: Political parties field heterogeneous candidates and send a variety of messages about their policy positions. Yet most voting models maintain that office-seeking parties should enforce intraparty homogeneity and cultivate clear party reputations. This article reconciles theory with reality by identifying a strategic rationale for parties to pursue heterogeneity. I develop a model in which two parties each select a distribution of potential candidates to compete in an upcoming election. The model demonstrates that well-positioned parties should indeed offer homogeneous candidate teams, but that parties with platforms distant from the median voter should cast a wide net. Extensions allow for multiple candidate signals, voters who care about party platforms and candidates’ positions, and voter uncertainty.

Keywords: Ambiguity; Downsian model; party heterogeneity; party reputation; party strategy; polarization; screening; uncertainty (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://jtp.sagepub.com/content/28/3/408.abstract (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:jothpo:v:28:y:2016:i:3:p:408-430

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Theoretical Politics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2019-10-20
Handle: RePEc:sae:jothpo:v:28:y:2016:i:3:p:408-430