Path-dependency and coordination in multi-candidate elections with behavioral voters
Costel Andonie and
Additional contact information
Costel Andonie: Department of Economics and Finance, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Daniel Diermeier: Harris School of Public Policy and Office of the Provost, The University of Chicago, USA; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Canada
Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2017, vol. 29, issue 4, 520-545
We consider a behavioral model of voting in multi-candidate elections under plurality rule. In the case of a positive impression of the campaign leader, voters increase their propensity to vote for that candidate, while in the case of a negative impression voters decrease their propensity. The formation of positive or negative impressions depends on an endogenous aspiration level. We show that in multi-candidate elections, in any stationary distribution, the winner receives a share of 50% of votes. Our results suggest that achieving coordination is â€˜path-dependentâ€™: whether voters manage to coordinate on the majority-preferred candidate critically depends on the initial state. We then identify conditions that make the election of the majority-preferred candidate more likely. However, even if the majority candidate is elected for sure, voting behavior is only partially coordinated.
Keywords: Behavioral model; multi-candidate elections; voter coordination (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:jothpo:v:29:y:2017:i:4:p:520-545
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Journal of Theoretical Politics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().