Structure, Indeterminacy and Chaos

Robert Huckfeldt

Journal of Theoretical Politics, 1990, vol. 2, issue 4, 413-433

Abstract: This paper re-examines the relationship between structural explanations and indeterminacy within the context of chaos and chaotic processes. The analysis demonstrates that the logic of a wholly determinate structure is not incompatible with a complex, apparently indeterminate outcome. This fact has important consequences for explanation in the social sciences, and for the evaluation of indeterminacy in social and political processes. In particular, it suggests that indeterminacy is not necessarily a repudiation of structural explanations for social and political life because a determinate structure is fully capable of generating complex and even seemingly stochastic behavior. Thus, the central task of the social sciences is correctly seen as an identification of the structure and logic underlying social processes, including the logic and structure of indeterminacy.

Keywords: structure; chaos; determinacy; coercion; non-compliance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1990
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0951692890002004004 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:jothpo:v:2:y:1990:i:4:p:413-433

DOI: 10.1177/0951692890002004004

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Theoretical Politics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().