EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Strategic Ambiguity with Probabilistic Voting

Yasushi Asako

Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2019, vol. 31, issue 4, 626-641

Abstract: Political parties and candidates usually prefer making ambiguous promises. This study identifies the conditions under which candidates choose ambiguous promises in equilibrium, given convex utility functions of voters. The results show that in a deterministic model, no equilibrium exists when voters have convex utility functions. However, in a probabilistic voting model, candidates make ambiguous promises in equilibrium when (i) voters have convex utility functions, and (ii) the distribution of voters’ most preferred policies is polarized. JEL Classification: D71, D72

Keywords: Elections; Political ambiguity; Public promise; Campaign platform; Probabilistic voting; Polarization (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0951629819875516 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:jothpo:v:31:y:2019:i:4:p:626-641

DOI: 10.1177/0951629819875516

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Theoretical Politics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2020-04-07
Handle: RePEc:sae:jothpo:v:31:y:2019:i:4:p:626-641