 Social Violence and Conservative Social Psychology: The Case of Erik EriksonTony Smith
Journal of Peace Research, 1976, vol. 13, issue 1, 1-11 Abstract: Erikson links intergroup violence to the fashion communities train their members to see themselves and otherness. The result of role learning or identity formation is regrettably but typically 'pseudospeciation', a tendency to see one's own group as something more than human while deni grating other groups to an inferior position. Erikson proposes to master pseudospeciation through the practice of judiciousness or 'mutuali ty', the psychological equivalent of the political value of tolerance whose practice he claims to have found demonstrated by Gandhi.Despite Erikson's obvious humanism, his con cept of mutuality is fundamentally unsatisfactory, for it is caught in an unresolved contradiction be tween his conviction that psychological well-being requires the sheltering environment of established social institutions and his recognition of a need for a critical analysis of social roles. Since Erik son's most fundamental theoretical tenets stress the importance of individual adaptation to socially prescribed forms of behavior, mutuality bids fair to function as a conservative political ideology. In its basic terms, Erikson's argument is common to an entire school of social psychology and the analysis of its limitations is therefore of relevance to the general discussion of the character and con trol of human aggression. Date: 1976 Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:joupea:v:13:y:1976:i:1:p:1-11 Access Statistics for this article More articles in Journal of Peace Research from Peace Research Institute Oslo |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.