 Alternative Defense Polieies and the Peace MovementBen Dankbaar
Journal of Peace Research, 1984, vol. 21, issue 2, 141-155 Abstract: In recent years several alternative defense policies have been developed which promise to diminish or eliminate the role of nuclear weapons in the defense of Western Europe, thereby fulfilling a major demand of the peace movement. It is argued that these alternatives and the peace movement have a common political background in the changing relaitonship between the U.S. and Western Europe. Furthermore, it is shown that the alternatives are also part of a long-standing debate on the uses of modern technology for defense. Presently developing NATO doctrine (Deep Strike) can be seen as a specific solution to both the issues of relations within the alliance and of military technology. Criticism of this doctrine by proponents of alternative defense policies is presented, clarifying the criteria used in the construction of the alternatives. Three types of alternatives are then characterized. First the proposals for No First Use and Inflexible Response, which are mainly concerned with the use and non-use of nuclear weapons; then the proposals for a conventional forward defense; lastly the proposals for conventional defense in depth. In a final paragraph it is shown how the different elements of these alternatives could merge in a general new approach to security in Europe. The prospects for this alternative approach to find political support are discussed briefly. Date: 1984 Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:joupea:v:21:y:1984:i:2:p:141-155 Access Statistics for this article More articles in Journal of Peace Research from Peace Research Institute Oslo |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.