The Rhetorical Strategies and the Misleading Nature of Attacks on `Postmodernism': A Reply to Østerud

Heikki Patomäki
Additional contact information
Heikki Patomäki: Finnish Institute of International Affairs, Helsinki

Journal of Peace Research, 1997, vol. 34, issue 3, 325-329

Abstract: As a reaction to Østerud's attack on `postmodernism', it is argued that post-structuralism, Critical Theory and critical realism should be seen as important responses to the crisis of positivism and modernity. Even the few `postmodernists' who would be willing to defend the idea that it is only thought and discourses that matter or that `anything goes' or that we should stop talking about truths have been able to contribute to transformations of understandings in a constructive way. Even though some of the actual critical-reflective analyses have been rather conventional, there is much room for producing even better critical-reflectivist studies in the future. However, Østerud's loaded terms have effects of power: there is an unjustified tendency to silence the emerging latemodern interpretative and explanatory possibilities.

Date: 1997
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://jpr.sagepub.com/content/34/3/325.abstract (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:joupea:v:34:y:1997:i:3:p:325-329

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Peace Research from Peace Research Institute Oslo
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().