All’s Well That Ends Well: A Reply to Oneal, Barbieri & Peters

Erik Gartzke and Quan Li ()

Journal of Peace Research, 2003, vol. 40, issue 6, 727-732

Abstract: Oneal and Barbieri & Peters offer divergent critiques of Gartzke & Li, who present a mathematical identity between competing operationalizations of dyadic interdependence, and show that the relationship one finds between conflict and commerce depends on how one constructs one’s dyadic indicator of trade. Oneal seems to accept the identity, but not some of its implications. Barbieri & Peters challenge the identity and offer contrasting results. Here, we show that Barbieri & Peters’s results are due to their model specification, which Gartzke & Li argue involves omitted variable bias.

Date: 2003
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://jpr.sagepub.com/content/40/6/727.abstract (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:joupea:v:40:y:2003:i:6:p:727-732

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Peace Research from Peace Research Institute Oslo
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().