Regime Type and International Conflict: Towards a General Model

Benjamin E. Goldsmith, Stephan K. Chalup and Michael J. Quinlan
Additional contact information
Benjamin E. Goldsmith: Department of Government & International Relations, University of Sydney, b.goldsmith@usyd.edu.au
Stephan K. Chalup: School of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science, University of Newcastle, Australia
Michael J. Quinlan: School of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science, University of Newcastle, Australia

Journal of Peace Research, 2008, vol. 45, issue 6, 743-763

Abstract: The authors take a new look at the relationship between regime type and deadly militarized conflict among pairs of states (dyads) in the international system. With the goal of describing the general functional form, they evaluate three perspectives: democratic peace, regime similarity and regime rationality. They employ both standard logistic regression (logit) and a recently developed machine learning technique, a support vector machine (SVM). Logit is dependent on assumptions that limit flexibility and make it difficult to discern the appropriate functional form. SVM estimation, on the other hand, is highly flexible and appears capable of discovering a relationship that is contingent on other variables in the model. SVM results indicate that regime similarity and joint democracy are important in most dyadic interactions. However, for the special but important case of the most dangerous dyads, regime rationality plays a role and the democratic peace effect is dominant. The results suggest that models of international conflict excluding distinct indicators for political similarity, joint democracy and joint autocracy may be misspecified. SVMs are an especially useful complement to conventional statistical methods.

Date: 2008
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://jpr.sagepub.com/content/45/6/743.abstract (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:joupea:v:45:y:2008:i:6:p:743-763

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Peace Research from Peace Research Institute Oslo
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().