Windows of repression: Using COVID-19 policies against political dissidents?

Joan Barceló, Robert Kubinec, Cindy Cheng, Tiril Høye Rahn and Luca Messerschmidt
Additional contact information
Joan Barceló: Division of Social Sciences, New York University - Abu Dhabi
Cindy Cheng: Hochschule für Politik at the Technical University of Munich (TUM) and the TUM School of Social Sciences and Technology
Tiril Høye Rahn: Division of Social Sciences, New York University - Abu Dhabi; University of Oxford
Luca Messerschmidt: Hochschule für Politik at the Technical University of Munich (TUM) and the TUM School of Social Sciences and Technology
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Joan Barceló

Journal of Peace Research, 2022, vol. 59, issue 1, 73-89

Abstract: What explains the great variation in the adoption, timing, and duration of government policies made in response to the COVID-19 pandemic? In this article, we explore whether government incentives to repress domestic dissidents influence their responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. We argue that COVID-19 containment policies are observationally equivalent to those that abusive governments use to limit domestic dissent – that is, policies that restrict citizens’ freedom of movement. This creates an opportunity for abusive governments to engage in repressive behavior without countervailing pressure from citizens and the international community. Following this logic, we expect abusive governments to be more likely to adopt restrictive policies, adopt them earlier in the course of the pandemic, and take longer to relax restrictions. Empirically, we find that governments that have recently engaged in state violence against civilians or abused citizens’ human rights were about 10% more likely to enact lockdown and curfew policies. Compared to less repressive countries, these policies were implemented approximately 48 days earlier in the pandemic and kept in place for approximately 23 days longer. Overall, our results advance our understanding of how the repressiveness of state institutions can shape policy responses to a global health crisis.

Keywords: COVID-19; health policy; human rights; pandemic; state repression (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00223433211062389 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:joupea:v:59:y:2022:i:1:p:73-89

DOI: 10.1177/00223433211062389

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Peace Research from Peace Research Institute Oslo
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().