Sequential Decision Making with Continuous Disease States and Measurements

Clyde B. Schechter

Medical Decision Making, 1990, vol. 10, issue 4, 256-265

Abstract: The model and strategy for sequential decision making using normally distributed measure ments proposed in a companion paper are applied to the problem of diagnosing diastolic hypertension. The assumptions of the model are discussed and justified clinically. Methods for assigning values to the model's parameters are explained and illustrated in the context of a hypothetical "generic" patient. Although current national recommendations and the sequential strategy both lead to an average of 1.89 measurements per patient prior to diagnosis, the sequential strategy applies a sequence of four or more measurements to 12% of patients. Fewer than 1% of patients would require ten or more measurements under this strategy. The sequential strategy leads to fewer patients' receiving unnecessary treatment and substantially higher expected utility for the patient. The role of multiple blood pressure determinations per visit is explored in the absence of appropriate estimates. Even under "best-case" assumptions, however, it is shown that obtaining more than one observation per visit is called for only in about 15% of visits. While the exact role of multiple determinations cannot be specified from existing data, it is likely to be much more limited than current recommendations suggest.

Keywords: Key words: Bayes' theorem; hypertension; conjugate-normal- linear model; decision analysis. (Med Decis Making 1990; 10:256-265) (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1990
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X9001000403 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:medema:v:10:y:1990:i:4:p:256-265

DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9001000403

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Medical Decision Making
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().