Gains in Accuracy from Replicated Readings of Diagnostic Images

Charles E. Metz and Jong-Her Shen

Medical Decision Making, 1992, vol. 12, issue 1, 60-75

Abstract: From the perspective of signal detection theory, human variation in image reading degrades diagnostic accuracy by broadening the statistical distributions of perceived evidence upon which decisions were based. A new multivariate "random-effects" model formulates the total variation in a diagnostic decision variable as a sum of three uncorrelated components that represent differences among cases, readers, and repeated readings by a given reader. This model provides a basis for quantitative predictions concerning the amount by which diagnostic accuracy, as specified by ROC analysis, can be enhanced by the replication of image readings. Although these predictions apply exactly only to the hypothetical situation in which normally distributed decision variables from equivalent readers are averaged, computer- simulation studies and an analysis of mammographic image-reading data from five radiol ogists show that similar gains in accuracy can be achieved by averaging discrete confidence ratings. Key words diagnostic accuracy, random-effects model; image interpretation; ROC analysis. (Med Decis Making 1992;12:60-75)

Date: 1992
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X9201200110 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:medema:v:12:y:1992:i:1:p:60-75

DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9201200110

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Medical Decision Making
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().