 How Should Effectiveness of Risk Communication to Aid Patients' Decisions Be Judged?Adrian Edwards and Glyn Elwyn Medical Decision Making, 1999, vol. 19, issue 4, 428-434 Abstract: Risk-communication interventions are associated with benefits at both the individual and the public health level. However, the types of outcomes used to assess the effec tiveness of risk-communication interventions vary greatly. This makes synthesis of the research in systematic review difficult, and limits both the implementation of advances in clinical practice and further research. This article reviews the outcomes used in risk- communication publications, particularly those addressing individual decisions about treatment. From the traditional cognitive and behavioral research outcomes of patient knowledge, risk perception, and compliance, the emphasis has shifted towards more affective outcomes, including satisfaction, assessment of the information provided and the decision-making process, and certainty about whether the best option has been chosen. These affective outcomes may be more specific and sensitive measures for risk-communication research. Further development and validation of measurement scales to address these issues is needed. Key words: risk communication; physician- patient communication; outcome assessment; affective outcomes. (Med Decis Making 1999;19:428-434) Date: 1999 Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:medema:v:19:y:1999:i:4:p:428-434 DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9901900411 Access Statistics for this article More articles in Medical Decision Making |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.