EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Patient Preference-based Treatment Thresholds and Recommendations

Malcolm Man-Son-Hing, Andreas Laupacis, Annette M. O'Connor, Douglas Coyle, Renee Berquist and Finlay McAlister
Additional contact information
Malcolm Man-Son-Hing: Address correspondence to Dr. Man-Son-Hing: Geriatric Assessment Unit, Ottawa Hospital, Civic Campus, 1053 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, ON, Canada. K1Y 4E9; telephone: (613) 761-5110; fax: (613) 761-5334; e-mail:
Andreas Laupacis: Address correspondence to Dr. Man-Son-Hing: Geriatric Assessment Unit, Ottawa Hospital, Civic Campus, 1053 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, ON, Canada. K1Y 4E9; telephone: (613) 761-5110; fax: (613) 761-5334; e-mail:
Annette M. O'Connor: Address correspondence to Dr. Man-Son-Hing: Geriatric Assessment Unit, Ottawa Hospital, Civic Campus, 1053 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, ON, Canada. K1Y 4E9; telephone: (613) 761-5110; fax: (613) 761-5334; e-mail:
Douglas Coyle: Address correspondence to Dr. Man-Son-Hing: Geriatric Assessment Unit, Ottawa Hospital, Civic Campus, 1053 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, ON, Canada. K1Y 4E9; telephone: (613) 761-5110; fax: (613) 761-5334; e-mail:
Renee Berquist: Address correspondence to Dr. Man-Son-Hing: Geriatric Assessment Unit, Ottawa Hospital, Civic Campus, 1053 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, ON, Canada. K1Y 4E9; telephone: (613) 761-5110; fax: (613) 761-5334; e-mail:
Finlay McAlister: Address correspondence to Dr. Man-Son-Hing: Geriatric Assessment Unit, Ottawa Hospital, Civic Campus, 1053 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, ON, Canada. K1Y 4E9; telephone: (613) 761-5110; fax: (613) 761-5334; e-mail:

Medical Decision Making, 2000, vol. 20, issue 4, 394-402

Abstract: Background. Decision analysis (DA) and the probability-tradeoff technique (PTOT) are patient preference-based methods of determining optimal therapy for individuals. Using aspirin therapy for the primary prevention of stroke and myocardial infarction (MI) in elderly persons as an example, the objective of this study was to determine whether group-level treatment thresholds and individual-level treatment recommendations derived using PTOT are identical to those of DA incorporating the patients' own values. Methods. Persons in a pilot study of the efficacy of aspirin in the prevention of stroke and MI were asked to participate. Participant values and utilities for pertinent health states (e.g., minor and major stroke, MI, major bleeding episode) were determined. Then, in three hypothetical clinical situations in which the chance of stroke or MI was varied, PTOT was used to directly determine treatment thresholds for aspirin therapy (i.e., the smallest reduction in MI or stroke risk for which participants would be willing to take aspirin). Using DA modeling, with the same probabilities of events as in the PTOT exercise and incorporating participants' own values, treatment thresholds for the three clinical situations were determined. The thresholds determined by the two approaches were compared. Finally, based on these treatment thresholds, using the best estimates of the efficacy of aspirin to prevent first-time stroke and MI, PTOT and DA treatment recommendations for individual participants were compared. Results. The 42 participants reported that a major stroke was the least desirable health state, followed by MI, minor stroke, and major bleeding. The minimum risk reduction required to take aspirin was greater for MI prevention compared with stroke prevention. For the two clinical situations in which the hypothetical efficacy of aspirin to prevent stroke was varied, treatment thresholds for the PTOT versus DA approaches differed (p

Date: 2000
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X0002000403 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:medema:v:20:y:2000:i:4:p:394-402

DOI: 10.1177/0272989X0002000403

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Medical Decision Making
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:20:y:2000:i:4:p:394-402