Utility Elicitation Using Single-Item Questions Compared with a Computerized Interview

Leslie A. Lenert, Cathy D. Sherbourne and Valerie Reyna
Additional contact information
Leslie A. Lenert: Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System and the University of California, San Diego
Cathy D. Sherbourne: RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California and University of Arizona, Tucson

Medical Decision Making, 2001, vol. 21, issue 2, 97-104

Abstract: Background . The use of a simpler procedure for the measurement of utilities could affect primarily the variance or both the mean and the variance of measurements. In the former case, simpler methods would be useful for population studies of preferences; however, in the latter, their use for such studies might be problematic. Purpose . The purpose of this study was to compare the results of utility elicitation using single-item questions to computer elicitation using the Ping-Pong search procedure. Methods . In a convenience sample of 149 primary care patients with symptoms of depression, the authors measured and compared standard gamble (SG) utilities elicited using a single-item “open question†to SG elicitations performed using a computerized interview procedure. Elicitations were performed 1 to 2 weeks apart to minimize memory effects. Results . More than 90% of persons with utilities of 1.0 to the single-item standard gamble had utilities of less than 1.0 on the computer SG instrument. Consistent with this finding, the mean utilities were lower in computer interviews (0.80 vs. 0.90; P

Keywords: computers; utility; health survey/questionnaires; data collection/questionnaires (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2001
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X0102100202 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:medema:v:21:y:2001:i:2:p:97-104

DOI: 10.1177/0272989X0102100202

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Medical Decision Making
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().