Preference for Equity As a Framing Effect

Peter A. Ubel, Jonathan Baron and David A. Asch
Additional contact information
Peter A. Ubel: Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor
Jonathan Baron: Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
David A. Asch: Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia

Medical Decision Making, 2001, vol. 21, issue 3, 180-189

Abstract: Background . In previous studies, the authors found that most people, given a fixed budget, would rather offer a less effective screening test to 100% of a Medicaid population than a more effective test to 50% of the population. In a subsequent study, the authors found that the number of people preferring the less effective screening test was dramatically reduced when the percentage of Medicaid enrollees receiving it was less than 100. In this article, 2 new studies are reported that explore whether people’s preferences for equity versus efficiency are susceptible to a framing effect. Methods . In 2 studies, the authors presented subjects with multiple scenarios involving screening tests that vary in the proportion of people who could receive the tests within a budget constraint and the number of people whose lives each test would save. Across scenarios, the proportion of Medicaid enrollees who could receive each test was varied, as was the question of whether scenarios involved Medicaid enrollees from the same or a different state. In addition, the authors varied the order in which subjects received the scenarios. Results . In the 1st study, people’s preferences for equity over efficiency varied significantly depending on the way situations were framed. Preference for equity was stronger when the more widely distributed choice covered the entire population than when it covered only half the population (P

Keywords: survey; public attitudes; equity; framing effect (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2001
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (12)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X0102100303 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:medema:v:21:y:2001:i:3:p:180-189

DOI: 10.1177/0272989X0102100303

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Medical Decision Making
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().