The Beguiling Pursuit of More Information

Donald A. Redelmeier, Eldar Shafir and Prince S. Aujla
Additional contact information
Donald A. Redelmeier: Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada, Clinical Epidemiology and Trauma Programs, Sunnybrook and Women’s College Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Eldar Shafir: Department of Psychology and the Woodrow Wilson School of Public Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey
Prince S. Aujla: Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Medical Decision Making, 2001, vol. 21, issue 5, 376-381

Abstract: Background. The authors tested whether clinicians make different decisions if they pursue information than if they receive the same information from the start. Methods. Three groups of clinicians participated (N = 1206): dialysis nurses (n = 171), practicing urologists (n = 461), and academic physicians (n = 574). Surveys were sent to each group containing medical scenarios formulated in 1 of 2 versions. The simple version of each scenario presented a choice between 2 options. The search version presented the same choice but only after some information had been missing and subsequently obtained. The 2 versions otherwise contained identical data and were randomly assigned. Results. In one scenario involving a personal choice about kidney donation, more dialysis nurses were willing to donate when they first decided to be tested for compatibility and were found suitable than when they knew they were suitable from the start (65% vs. 44% , P =0.007). Similar discrepancies were found in decisions made by practicing urologists concerning surgery for a patient with prostate cancer and in decisions of academic physicians considering emergency management for a patient with acute chest pain. Conclusions. The pursuit of information can increase its salience and cause clinicians to assign more importance to the information than if the same information was immediately available. An awareness of this cognitive bias may lead to improved decision making in difficult medical situations.

Keywords: uncertainty; reasoning; judgment; rationality (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2001
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X0102100504 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:medema:v:21:y:2001:i:5:p:376-381

DOI: 10.1177/0272989X0102100504

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Medical Decision Making
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().