Frequency or Probability? A Qualitative Study of Risk Communication Formats Used in Health Care

Marilyn M. Schapira, Ann B. Nattinger and Colleen A. McHorney
Additional contact information
Marilyn M. Schapira: Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, and the Center for Health Services Management and Research and Veterans Administration Medical Center, Lexington, Kentucky
Ann B. Nattinger: Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, and the Center for Health Services Management and Research and Veterans Administration Medical Center, Lexington, Kentucky
Colleen A. McHorney: Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, and the Center for Health Services Management and Research and Veterans Administration Medical Center, Lexington, Kentucky

Medical Decision Making, 2001, vol. 21, issue 6, 459-467

Abstract: Background . The communication of probabilistic outcomes is an essential aspect of shared medical decision making. Methods . The authors conducted a qualitative study using focus groups to evaluate the response of women to various formats used in the communication of breast cancer risk. Findings . Graphic discrete frequency formats using highlighted human figures had greater salience than continuous probability formats using bar graphs. Potential biases in the estimation of risk magnitude were associated with the use of highlighted human figures versus bar graphs and the denominator size in graphics using highlighted human figures. The presentation of uncertainty associated with risk estimates caused some to loose trust in the information, whereas others were accepting of uncertainty in scientific data. Conclusion . The qualitative study identified new constructs with regard to how patients process probabilistic information. Further research in the clinical setting is needed to provide a theoretical justification for the format used when presenting risk information to patients.

Keywords: risk perception; graphical displays; breast neoplasm; health education; patient education; decision making (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2001
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (20)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X0102100604 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:medema:v:21:y:2001:i:6:p:459-467

DOI: 10.1177/0272989X0102100604

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Medical Decision Making
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().