Physicians’ Attitudes toward Health Care Rationing

Thomas V. Perneger, Diane P. Martin and Patrick A. Bovier
Additional contact information
Thomas V. Perneger: Quality of Care Unit, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland, Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
Diane P. Martin: Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
Patrick A. Bovier: Quality of Care Unit, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland, Department of Community Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland

Medical Decision Making, 2002, vol. 22, issue 1, 65-70

Abstract: Background . Optimal allocation of health care resources under a limited budget is controversial. Particularly important questions are whether rationing decisions should be based on efficiency considerations alone or in combination with equity considerations, and who should be in charge of such decisions. In this study, the authors sought to understand the position of Swiss physicians toward rationing using a previously developed rationing scenario. Methods . The authors examined the acceptability of various scenarios implementing health care rationing in a mail survey of 1184 physicians practicing in Geneva, Switzerland. Respondents were asked to choose between providing a suboptimal cancer screening test A to the whole population, which would save 1000 lives, or selecting half of the population to receive a better but more expensive test B, which would save 1100 lives. Physicians were randomly assigned to 3 versions of the scenario: Beneficiaries of test B could be chosen by lottery, on a first-come-first-served basis, or by medical associations. Results . Only 26% of physicians chose the more effective selective rationing option; this proportion was lowest when test beneficiaries were selected by lottery (14%), intermediate for the first-come-first-served scenario (26%), and highest when selection was left to medical associations (39%; P

Keywords: health care rationing; health policy; physicians’ attitudes (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2002
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X0202200106 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:medema:v:22:y:2002:i:1:p:65-70

DOI: 10.1177/0272989X0202200106

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Medical Decision Making
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().