Willingness to Pay for What? A Note on Alternative Definitions of Health Care Program Benefits for Contingent Valuation Studies

Gillian R. Currie, Cam Donaldson, Bernie J. O’Brien, Greg L. Stoddart, George W. Torrance and Michael F. Drummond
Additional contact information
Gillian R. Currie: Department of Economics, Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Cam Donaldson: Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, Department of Economics and Centre for Health Services Research, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Bernie J. O’Brien: Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, Centre for Evaluation of Medicines, St. Joseph’s Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Greg L. Stoddart: Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
George W. Torrance: Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, Centre for Evaluation of Medicines, St. Joseph’s Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, Innovus Research Inc., Burlington, Ontario, Canada
Michael F. Drummond: Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, United Kingdom

Medical Decision Making, 2002, vol. 22, issue 6, 493-497

Abstract: The authors examine a number of ways in which willingness to pay (WTP) can be defined for measurement and use in a cost-benefit analysis (CBA) of a collectively funded health care program. They show how ambiguous specification of the program consequences that respondents should consider in their WTP responses can lead to problems of double counting or zero counting in a subsequent CBA. An example is whether the value of lost time from work because of poor health should be included by a CBA analyst (e.g., valued at the wage rate) as a separate cost item or whether this has already been monetized and included in respondents’ WTP data. The authors highlight how differences in assumed or actual institutional structures are often ignored in measures of WTP and the consequences of this for the interpretation of WTP data.

Keywords: cost-benefit analysis; contingent valuation; willingness to pay (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2002
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X02238301 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:medema:v:22:y:2002:i:6:p:493-497

DOI: 10.1177/0272989X02238301

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Medical Decision Making
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().