EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Men with Prostate Cancer: Making Decisions about Complementary/Alternative Medicine

Heather Boon, Judith Belle Brown, Alan Gavin and Kathleen Westlake

Medical Decision Making, 2003, vol. 23, issue 6, 471-479

Abstract: Purpose. The purpose ofthis study was to explore prostate cancer patients’ perceptions, feelings, ideas, and experiences regarding making decisions to use (or not use) complementary/alternative medicine (CAM). Methods. Five focus groups were conducted with 29 men diagnosed with prostate cancer. Content analysis ofthe verbatim transcripts was used to identify key themes in the data. Findings. Decision making about CAM treatments appears to depend on both fixed (e.g., disease characteristics, demographic characteristics, and medical history) and flexible (e.g., perceptions of CAM and conventional-medicine, experiences with the health care system and health care practitioners, and perceptions about the need for control or action) decision factors. Conclusions. The participants in this study appeared more likely to be “pushed†toward using CAM by negative experiences with the health care system than to be “pulled†toward CAM by perceptions about its safety or congruence with their beliefs about health and illness.

Date: 2003
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X03259815 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:medema:v:23:y:2003:i:6:p:471-479

DOI: 10.1177/0272989X03259815

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Medical Decision Making
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:23:y:2003:i:6:p:471-479