Radiologist Uncertainty and the Interpretation of Screening

Patricia A. Carney, Joann G. Elmore, Linn A. Abraham, Martha S. Gerrity, R. Edward Hendrick, Stephen H. Taplin, William E. Barlow, Gary R. Cutter, Steven P. Poplack and Carl J. D’Orsi
Additional contact information
Patricia A. Carney: Department of Community and Family Medicine, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover and Lebanon, New Hampshire
Joann G. Elmore: Department of Internal Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle
Linn A. Abraham: Center for Health Studies, Group Health Cooperative, Seattle, Washington
Martha S. Gerrity: Department of Internal Medicine, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland
R. Edward Hendrick: Lynn Sage Comprehensive Breast Center, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois
Stephen H. Taplin: Center for Health Studies, Group Health Cooperative, Seattle, Washington, Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
William E. Barlow: Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, and Cancer Research and Biostatistics, Seattle
Gary R. Cutter: Center for Research Design and Statistical Methods, University of Nevada School of Medicine, Reno
Steven P. Poplack: Department of Radiology, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover and Lebanon, New Hampshire
Carl J. D’Orsi: Breast Imaging Center, Emory Health Care Services, Atlanta, Georgia

Medical Decision Making, 2004, vol. 24, issue 3, 255-264

Abstract: Objective . To determine radiologists’ reactions to uncertainty when interpreting mammography and the extent to which radiologist uncertainty explains variability in interpretive performance. Methods . The authors used a mailed survey to assess demographic and clinical characteristics of radiologists and reactions to uncertainty associated with practice. Responses were linked to radiologists’ actual interpretive performance data obtained from 3 regionally located mammography registries. Results . More than 180 radiologists were eligible to participate, and 139 consented for a response rate of 76.8%. Radiologist gender, more years interpreting, and higher volume were associated with lower uncertainty scores. Positive predictive value, recall rates, and specificity were more affected by reactions to uncertainty than sensitivity or negative predictive value; however, none of these relationships was statistically significant. Conclusion . Certain practice factors, such as gender and years of interpretive experience, affect uncertainty scores. Radiologists’ reactions to uncertainty do not appear to affect interpretive performance.

Keywords: medical decision making; physician uncertainty; medical malpractice; mammography interpretation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2004
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X04265480 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:medema:v:24:y:2004:i:3:p:255-264

DOI: 10.1177/0272989X04265480

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Medical Decision Making
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().