EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Correcting Biases in Standard Gamble and Time Tradeoff Utilities

Sylvie M. C. van Osch, Peter Wakker, Wilbert B. van den Hout and Anne M. Stiggelbout
Additional contact information
Sylvie M. C. van Osch: Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Medical Decision Making, J10-S, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands; phone: +31 (0)71-5264570; fax: +31 (0)71-5266838s.m.c.van_osch@lumc.nl
Anne M. Stiggelbout: Department of Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands

Medical Decision Making, 2004, vol. 24, issue 5, 511-517

Abstract: The standard gamble (SG) method and the time tradeoff (TTO) method are commonly used tomeasure utilities. However, they are distorted by biases due to loss aversion, scale compatibility, utility curvature for life duration, and probability weighting. This article applies corrections for these biases and provides new data on these biases and their corrections. The SG and TTO utilities of 6 rheumatoid arthritis health states were assessed for 45 healthy respondents. Various corrections of utilities were considered. The uncorrected TTO scores and the corrected (for utility curvature) TTO scores provided similar results. This article provides arguments suggesting that the TTO scores are biased upward rather than having balanced biases. The only downward bias in TTO scores was small and probably cannot offset the upward biases. TheTTOscores are higher than the theoretically most preferred correction of the SG, the mixed correction. These findings suggest that uncorrected SG scores, which are higher than TTO scores, are too high.

Keywords: utility assessment; bias; loss aversion; utility curvature; probability weighting (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2004
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (31)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X04268955 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:medema:v:24:y:2004:i:5:p:511-517

DOI: 10.1177/0272989X04268955

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Medical Decision Making
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:24:y:2004:i:5:p:511-517