Group Sequential Design for Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: Implications and Guidelines for Practitioners

Madhu Mazumdar
Additional contact information
Madhu Mazumdar: Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 307 E. 63rd St., 3rd floor, New York, NY 10021; phone: 646-735-8115; fax: 646-735-0010mazumdar@biost.mskcc.org.

Medical Decision Making, 2004, vol. 24, issue 5, 525-533

Abstract: Purpose. Comparative diagnostic accuracy (CDA) studies are typically small retrospective studies supporting a higher accuracy for one modality over another for either staging a particular disease or assessing response to therapy, and they are used to generate hypotheses for larger prospective trials. The purpose of this article is to introduce the group sequential design (GSD) approach in planning these larger trials. Methods. Methodology needed for using GSD in the CDA studies is recently developed. In this article, GSD with the O’Brien and Fleming (OBF) stopping rule is described and guidelines for sample size calculation are provided. Simulated data is used to demonstrate the application of GSD in the design/analysis of a clinical trial in theCDAstudy setting. Results. The expected sample size needed for planning a trial with GSD (under the OBF stopping rule) is slightly inflated but may ultimately result in greater savings of patient resources. Conclusion. GSD is a specialized statistical method that is helpful in balancing the ethical and financial advantages of stopping a study early against the risk of an incorrect conclusion and should be adopted for planning CDAstudies.

Keywords: fixed sample design; receiver operating characteristic analysis; area under the curve (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2004
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X04269240 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:medema:v:24:y:2004:i:5:p:525-533

DOI: 10.1177/0272989X04269240

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Medical Decision Making
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().