Being There Is Important, but Getting There Matters Too: The Role of Path in the Valuation Process

Julie H. Goldberg
Additional contact information
Julie H. Goldberg: University of Illinois at Chicago, College of Medicine, Department of Medical Education, M/C 591, 808 South Wood Street, 986 CME, Chicago, IL 60612; 60612; telephone: (312) 996-8077; fax: (312) 413-2048; julieg@uic.edu

Medical Decision Making, 2006, vol. 26, issue 4, 323-337

Abstract: Purpose . Traditional decision-analytic models presume that utilities are invariant to context. The influence of 2 types of context on patients' utility assessments was examined here the path by which one reaches a health state and personal experience with a health state. Methods . Three groups of patients were interviewed: men older than age 49 years with prostate cancer but no diabetes (CaP), diabetes but no prostate cancer (DM), and neither disease (ND). The utility of erectile dysfunction (ED) was assessed using a standard gamble (SG). Each subject completed 2 SGs: 1) a no-context version that gave no explanation for the cause of ED and 2) a contextualized version in which prostate cancer treatment, the failure to manage diabetes, or the natural course of aging was said to be the cause. Results . Patients with disease assigned higher utilities to ED in a matching context than in discrepant contexts. Regression models found that the valuation process was also sensitive to the match between disease path in the utility assessment and patients' personal experiences. Conclusions . These findings lend insight into why acontextual utility assessments typically used in decision analyses have not been able to predict patient behavior as well as expected. The valuation process appears to change systematically when context is specified, suggesting that unspecified contexts rather than random error may lead to fluctuations in the values assigned to identical health states.

Keywords: decision-analytic models; utility assessments; health state; patient behavior; erectile dysfunction (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2006
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X06291680 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:medema:v:26:y:2006:i:4:p:323-337

DOI: 10.1177/0272989X06291680

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Medical Decision Making
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().