Misleading Measurements: Modeling the Effects of Blood Pressure Misclassification in a United States Population
Tom Marshall
Additional contact information
Tom Marshall: Department of Public Health & Epidemiology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK; telephone: 44 121 414 7422; fax: 44 121 414 7878; T.P.Marshall@bham.ac.uk.
Medical Decision Making, 2006, vol. 26, issue 6, 624-632
Abstract:
Objective. The clinical diagnosis of hypertension is subject to misclassification, and this may be clinically important. This article calculates positive and negative predictive values for blood pressure measurement and assesses the frequency of clinically important blood pressure misclassification. Design, Setting, and Participants. A modeling study was carried out on 4763 adults in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) population. True treatment eligibility was determined by applying Joint National Committee (JNC) VII criteria to individuals in the study population. Each individual was also allocated a series of blood pressures incorporating an error term reflecting day-to-day measurement variation. Test positives are persons classified as needing treatment on the basis of the mean of 2 blood pressure measurements. Measurements and Main Results. Positive predictive values of a diagnosis of hypertension based on 2 measurements were calculated for each age-sex group. Low-risk false positives and highrisk false negatives were categorized as clinically important errors. Positive predictive values are high in persons older than age 65. In persons ages 16 to 34, the positive predictive value is 0.24 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.17–0.32) in men and 0.16 (95% CI: 0.06–0.26) in women. Persons younger than age 35 are almost always at low risk of cardiovascular disease, and therefore this misclassification is clinically important. Even with 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurement, positive predictive values in young adults are under 0.5. Conclusions. Blood pressure estimation is a poor diagnostic test in low-prevalence populations such as young adults. Estimation of blood pressure should be informed by prior estimation of cardiovascular risk.
Keywords: blood pressure; measurement error; screening; diagnostic tests; heart disease (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2006
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X06295356 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:medema:v:26:y:2006:i:6:p:624-632
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X06295356
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Medical Decision Making
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().