Public Health Sealant Delivery Programs: Optimal Delivery and the Cost of Practice Acts

Christina R. Scherrer, Paul M. Griffin and Julie L. Swann
Additional contact information
Christina R. Scherrer: School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta
Paul M. Griffin: School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, pgriffin@isye.gatech.edu
Julie L. Swann: School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta

Medical Decision Making, 2007, vol. 27, issue 6, 762-771

Abstract: Background. The greatest unmet health need for US children is dental care. School-based sealant programs target low-income, high-risk second graders and are effective in preventing caries for as long as the sealant material remains in place. However, it is not clear whether such programs make efficient use of available resources and staffing. Methods. The authors used discrete event simulation to determine the optimal combinations of staffing levels and sealant stations for school-based sealant programs. Using data provided by state programs and the literature, they modeled different-sized programs under different practice act constraints and determined times and associated costs. A detailed economic analysis was done for Wisconsin. Results. For general, direct, or indirect supervision, it is optimal to have only 1 dentist or no dentists for no supervision. For general supervision, it is optimal to have the dentist and dental assistant to come on separate days to screen. The cost savings for adding an assistant and chair averaged over all of the program sizes and travel distances ranged from 4.50% (SE= 0.89) to 10.94% (SE= 0.56). Significant cost savings also result from reducing the required supervision level (8.72% [SE = 1.61] to 29.96% [SE= 1.67]). The cost of the practice act for the state of Wisconsin for 2003 was from $83,041 to $346,156, significantly more than its annual budget. Conclusions. States could save money by relaxing restrictions on the type of personnel who can deliver sealants in public health settings and by productivity gains through proper consideration of staffing. The savings could be used to improve access to sealant programs and further reduce disparities in oral health.

Keywords: public health; sealant; dental care; children; cost savings. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2007
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X07302134 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:medema:v:27:y:2007:i:6:p:762-771

DOI: 10.1177/0272989X07302134

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Medical Decision Making
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().