Estimation of a Preference-Based Index from a Condition-Specific Measure: The King's Health Questionnaire

John Brazier, Carolyn Czoski-Murray, Jennifer Roberts, Martin Brown, Tara Symonds and Con Kelleher
Additional contact information
John Brazier: Section of Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, UK, J.E.Brazier@sheffield.ac.uk
Carolyn Czoski-Murray: Section of Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, UK
Martin Brown: Worldwide Outcomes Research, Pfizer Global Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer Ltd, Kent, UK
Tara Symonds: Worldwide Outcomes Research, Pfizer Global Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer Ltd, Kent, UK
Con Kelleher: Guys and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

Medical Decision Making, 2008, vol. 28, issue 1, 113-126

Abstract: Background. Generic preference-based measures of health may not adequately cover the impact of some conditions. There is therefore increasing interest in developing condition-specific preference-based measures. Objectives. The purpose of this study was to estimate a preference-based measure from a condition-specific measure of health for urinary incontinence, the 21-item King's Health Questionnaire, for use in economic evaluation. Methods. The King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) was revised into a 5-dimensional health state classification amenable to valuation using items selected using psychometric evidence. Forty-nine states were valued using standard gamble by a representative sample of patients with urinary incontinence attending UK hospital outpatient clinics. Each respondent was asked to value 9 health states. Models have been estimated for predicting health state valuations for all 1024 states defined by the KHQ classification. The modeling had to cope with the clustering of data by respondent and its skewed distribution. Results. In total, 110 usable interviews were obtained from 169 patients approached to participate in the study. These responders generated 959 health state valuations. Mean health state values ranged from 0.77 to 0.98. Models were estimated using mean health state values and random effects models of individual-level health state values. These models generated robust estimates of the `main effects,` and in general, the results support the ordinality of the KHQ health state classification. There were problems modeling interaction effects, and a number of alternatives were explored. Conclusion. The recommended model for estimating a preference-based measure from the condition-specific KHQ is presented.

Keywords: utilities; King Health Questionnaire; urinary incontinence; health economics; methodology; utilities and preferences. (Med Decis Making 2008; 28:113—126) (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (12)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X07301820 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:medema:v:28:y:2008:i:1:p:113-126

DOI: 10.1177/0272989X07301820

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Medical Decision Making
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().