The Impact of Individualized Evidence-Based Decision Support on Aneurysm Patients' Decision Making, Ideals of Autonomy, and Quality of Life

Anne M. Stiggelbout, Albert C. Molewijk, Wilma Otten, J. Hajo Van Bockel, Cornelis M. A. Bruijninckx, Ilse Van der Salm and Job Kievit
Additional contact information
Anne M. Stiggelbout: Department of Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, the Netherlands, A.M.Stiggelbout@lumc.nl
Albert C. Molewijk: Department of Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, the Netherlands
Wilma Otten: Department of Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, the Netherlands
J. Hajo Van Bockel: Department of (Vascular) Surgery, LUMC, Leiden, the Netherlands
Cornelis M. A. Bruijninckx: Department of Surgery, Leyenburg Hospital, The Hague, the Netherlands
Ilse Van der Salm: Department of Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, the Netherlands
Job Kievit: Department of Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, the Netherlands, Department of (Vascular) Surgery, LUMC, Leiden, the Netherlands

Medical Decision Making, 2008, vol. 28, issue 5, 751-762

Abstract: Background . A major challenge in surgery is the integration of evidence-based medicine and patient autonomy. The authors present a randomized trial studying the effect of an individualized evidence-based brochure (IB) on patients' autonomous behavior, patients' ideals of autonomy, and quality of life. Method . Patients with an asymptomatic abdominal aneurysm and their surgeon were randomized to receive a general brochure (GB) or an IB presenting survival information and a ranking of the treatment strategies. Before and after receiving the brochure, patients filled out questionnaires on their behavior during the consultation, ideals of patient autonomy, and quality of life. Surgeons answered a short checklist evaluating the consultation. Results . One hundred patients participated, 49 in the intervention, 51 in the control group. The IB group had a better understanding of important issues in the treatment decision, had prepared more questions, and was less satisfied with the duration of the consultation. Their impression that the surgeon perceived them more as a medical problem than a patient with a problem increased. They agreed less with the surgeon's advice and lost some of their belief in ``the doctor knows best.'' Beforehand, the IB group had a stronger preference for patient-based decisions, but afterward they displayed more surgeon-based decisions. No effects were seen on patients' quality of life. Conclusions . Individualized evidence-based information stimulated patients' active involvement but in the context of our study led to less patient-based decisions. Patient-made decisions and patient autonomy should, however, not be equated.

Keywords: Key words: decision analysis; vascular surgical procedures; patient satisfaction; physician-patient relations; autonomy. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X08321680 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:medema:v:28:y:2008:i:5:p:751-762

DOI: 10.1177/0272989X08321680

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Medical Decision Making
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().