How Far Do You Go? Efficient Searching for Indirect Evidence

Neil Hawkins, David A. Scott and Beth Woods
Additional contact information
Neil Hawkins: Oxford Outcomes Ltd, Oxford, UK, neil.hawkins@oxfordoutcomes.com
David A. Scott: Oxford Outcomes Ltd, Oxford, UK
Beth Woods: Oxford Outcomes Ltd, Oxford, UK

Medical Decision Making, 2009, vol. 29, issue 3, 273-281

Abstract: Background. Indirect evidence is particularly valuable in health care decision making when direct trial evidence comparing relevant treatments is absent or limited. Current approaches using a predetermined set of comparators in the search query may fail to identify all relevant indirect evidence. Purpose. To present a framework for the efficient design of search strategies for identifying clinical trials providing indirect evidence for a treatment comparison. Findings. The authors present 2 search strategies that differ from traditional search strategies in using a series of iterative searches to identify the set of relevant comparators. In both, the comparators included in each search are determined by the results of previous searches. For a given number of searches, the strategies presented will find all indirect comparisons that include a certain number of comparators linking the treatments of interest. Methods of estimating the value of indirect evidence via a given number of comparators linking the treatments of interest are presented, thus allowing the burden of additional searching to be traded off against the likely impact of finding more distant comparisons. A practical illustration of the search strategies in the context of informing a network meta-analysis of second-line treatments for non-small cell lung cancer is presented. Conclusions. The iterative strategies presented offer a means of identifying such evidence and allow the researcher to determine the optimal scope of the search by estimating the value of additional indirect evidence.

Keywords: evidence synthesis; indirect evidence; search strategies; oncology. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X08330120 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:medema:v:29:y:2009:i:3:p:273-281

DOI: 10.1177/0272989X08330120

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Medical Decision Making
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().