Recommendations for Modeling Disaster Responses in Public Health and Medicine: A Position Paper of the Society for Medical Decision Making

Margaret L. Brandeau, Jessica H. McCoy, Nathaniel Hupert, Jon-Erik Holty and Dena M. Bravata
Additional contact information
Margaret L. Brandeau: Department of Management Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California
Jessica H. McCoy: Department of Management Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California
Nathaniel Hupert: Department of Public Health, Weill Medical College, Cornell University, New York
Jon-Erik Holty: Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
Dena M. Bravata: Nathaniel Hupert is currently Director of the Preparedness Modeling Unit of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Center for Primary Care and Outcomes Research Stanford University, Stanford, California

Medical Decision Making, 2009, vol. 29, issue 4, 438-460

Abstract: Purpose. Mathematical and simulation models are increasingly used to plan for and evaluate health sector responses to disasters, yet no clear consensus exists regarding best practices for the design, conduct, and reporting of such models. The authors examined a large selection of published health sector disaster response models to generate a set of best practice guidelines for such models. Methods . The authors reviewed a spectrum of published disaster response models addressing public health or health care delivery, focusing in particular on the type of disaster and response decisions considered, decision makers targeted, choice of outcomes evaluated, modeling methodology, and reporting format. They developed initial recommendations for best practices for creating and reporting such models and refined these guidelines after soliciting feedback from response modeling experts and from members of the Society for Medical Decision Making. Results . The authors propose 6 recommendations for model construction and reporting, inspired by the most exemplary models: health sector disaster response models should address real-world problems, be designed for maximum usability by response planners, strike the appropriate balance between simplicity and complexity, include appropriate outcomes that extend beyond those considered in traditional cost-effectiveness analyses, and be designed to evaluate the many uncertainties inherent in disaster response. Finally, good model reporting is particularly critical for disaster response models. Conclusions . Quantitative models are critical tools for planning effective health sector responses to disasters. The proposed recommendations can increase the applicability and interpretability of future models, thereby improving strategic, tactical, and operational aspects of preparedness planning and response.

Keywords: disaster planning; mass casualty incidents; computer simulation; cost-benefit analysis; guideline. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X09340346 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:medema:v:29:y:2009:i:4:p:438-460

DOI: 10.1177/0272989X09340346

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Medical Decision Making
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().