EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Additional Patient Outcomes and Pathways in Evaluations of Testing

Patrick M. M. Bossuyt and Kirsten McCaffery
Additional contact information
Patrick M. M. Bossuyt: Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands, p.m.bossuyt@amc.uva.nl
Kirsten McCaffery: Screening and Test Evaluation Program, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Australia

Medical Decision Making, 2009, vol. 29, issue 5, E30-E38

Abstract: Before medical tests are introduced into practice, they should be properly evaluated. Randomized trials and other comprehensive evaluations of tests and test strategies can best be designed based on an understanding of how tests can benefit or harm patients. Tests primarily affect patients’ health by guiding clinical decision making and downstream management, such as the decision to order more tests or to start, stop, or modify treatment. In this article, the authors demonstrate that tests can have additional effects on patient outcome, which may be cognitive, emotional, social, or behavioral. They present a framework to help researchers and policy makers consider the cognitive, emotional, social, and behavioral effects of testing. These additional effects may be important themselves and may also influence the clinical outcomes of testing through different pathways. The authors provide examples from test evaluations in the literature to illustrate how these additional effects can be important in the evaluation of testing or indeed any health intervention.

Keywords: diagnostic test evaluation; clinical research methodology; randomized trial methodology; quality of life. (Med Decis Making 2009; 29:E30—E38) (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X09347013 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:medema:v:29:y:2009:i:5:p:e30-e38

DOI: 10.1177/0272989X09347013

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Medical Decision Making
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:29:y:2009:i:5:p:e30-e38