Breast Cancer Patients’ Treatment Expectations after Exposure to the Decision Aid Program Adjuvant Online: The Influence of Numeracy

Isaac M. Lipkus, Ellen Peters, Gretchen Kimmick, Vlayka Liotcheva and Paul Marcom
Additional contact information
Isaac M. Lipkus: Duke University School of Nursing, Durham, NC, isaac.lipkus@duke.edu
Ellen Peters: Decision Research, Eugene, OR
Gretchen Kimmick: Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
Vlayka Liotcheva: Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
Paul Marcom: Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC

Medical Decision Making, 2010, vol. 30, issue 4, 464-473

Abstract: The decision aid called ‘‘Adjuvant Online’’ (Adjuvant! for short) helps breast cancer patients make treatment decisions by providing numerical estimates of treatment efficacy (e.g., 10-y relapse or survival). Studies exploring how patients’ numeracy interacts with the estimates provided by Adjuvant! are lacking. Pooling across 2 studies totaling 105 women with estrogen receptor—positive, early-stage breast cancer, the authors explored patients’ treatment expectations, perceived benefit from treatments, and confidence of personal benefit from treatments. Patients who were more numerate were more likely to provide estimates of cancer-free survival that matched the estimates provided by Adjuvant! for each treatment option compared with patients with lower numeracy (odds ratios of 1.6 to 2.4). As estimates of treatment efficacy provided by Adjuvant! increased, so did patients’ estimates of cancer-free survival (0.37 > r s > 0.48) and their perceptions of treatment benefit from hormonal therapy (r s = 0.28) and combined therapy (r s = 0.27). These relationships were significantly more pronounced for those with higher numeracy, especially for perceived benefit of combined therapy. Results suggest that numeracy influences a patient’s ability to interpret numerical estimates of treatment efficacy from decision aids such as Adjuvant!.

Keywords: patient decision making; risk communication or risk perception; numeracy; breast cancer/mammography; health literacy. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X09360371 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:medema:v:30:y:2010:i:4:p:464-473

DOI: 10.1177/0272989X09360371

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Medical Decision Making
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().