Exploring Model Uncertainty in Economic Evaluation of Health Interventions: The Example of Rotavirus Vaccination in Vietnam

Sun-Young Kim, Sue J. Goldie and Joshua A. Salomon
Additional contact information
Sun-Young Kim: Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, sykim@hsph.harvard.edu, Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
Sue J. Goldie: Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
Joshua A. Salomon: Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts

Medical Decision Making, 2010, vol. 30, issue 5, E1-E28

Abstract: Objective . Motivated by observed discrepancies between 2 published studies on the cost-effectiveness of rotavirus vaccination in Vietnam, the authors’ objectives were to illustrate a specific, systematic approach to assessing model (structure and process) uncertainty and to quantify explicitly the contributions of different sources of variation in the outputs of different studies that share the same research question. Methods . On the basis of a series of working definitions of key model elements, the authors developed 5 alternative computer simulation (state-transition) models of rotavirus disease. They examined how epidemiological outcomes and cost-effectiveness ratios associated with rotavirus vaccination would change as elements of model structure and modeling process were progressively modified. They also explicitly decomposed the relative contributions of different modeling elements to differences in the cost-effectiveness results between the 2 previous analyses motivating the present study. Results . The findings suggest that within the category of a static, deterministic, aggregate-level model, different choices in model structure and process lead to relatively modest differences in the estimated cost-effectiveness of rotavirus vaccination, but that intermediate epidemiologic outcomes vary more substantially depending on the choice of model structure. Conclusions . The authors caution against generalizing the quantitative results in this study beyond the present example but suggest that the approach presented here may serve as a template for other examinations of model uncertainty. As new research questions arise after the introduction of rotavirus vaccination programs, a reevaluation of model uncertainty is likely to be needed.

Keywords: Model uncertainty; cost effectiveness; rotavirus vaccination. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X10375579 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:medema:v:30:y:2010:i:5:p:e1-e28

DOI: 10.1177/0272989X10375579

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Medical Decision Making
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().