Cohort Decomposition for Markov Cost-Effectiveness Models

Gordon Hazen

Medical Decision Making, 2011, vol. 31, issue 1, 19-34

Abstract: Cohort analysis is a widespread tool for computing expected costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) in Markov models for medical cost-effectiveness analyses. Although not always explicitly identified, such models commonly have multiple simple factors, or components. In these, a health state consists of a multiple component vector, one component for each factor, and arbitrary combinations of components are possible. The authors show here that when the model does not assume any probabilistic dependence among these factors, then a standard cohort analysis may be decomposed into several independent cohort analyses, one for each factor, and the results may be combined to produce desired expected costs and QALYs. These single-factor cohort analyses are not only simpler but also computationally more efficient. The authors derive the appropriate formulas for this cohort decomposition in discrete time and give several examples of their use based on published cost-effectiveness analyses. Explicitly identifying the simple factors of which a model is composed allows these factors to be portrayed graphically. Graphical depiction of the simple factors that comprise a model reduces model complexity, makes model formulation easier and more transparent, and thereby facilitates peer inspection and critique.

Keywords: Markov models; mathematical models and decision analysis, cost-effectivenessanalysis; women’s health (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X10368999 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:medema:v:31:y:2011:i:1:p:19-34

DOI: 10.1177/0272989X10368999

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Medical Decision Making
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().