The Relative Importance of Quality of Care Information When Choosing a Hospital for Surgical Treatment

P. J. Marang- van de Mheen, J. Dijs-Elsinga, W. Otten, M. Versluijs, H. J. Smeets, R. Vree, W. J. van der Made and J. Kievit

Medical Decision Making, 2011, vol. 31, issue 6, 816-827

Abstract: Objective : To assess the impact of quality of care and other hospital information on patients’ choices between hospitals. Methods : 665 former surgical patients were invited to respond to an Internet-based questionnaire including a choice-based conjoint analysis. Each patient was presented with 12 different comparisons of 2 hospitals, with each hospital characterized by 6 attributes containing 2 levels. Hospital attributes were included if frequently reported by patients as most important for future hospital choices. These included both general hospital information (e.g., atmosphere), information on quality of care (e.g., percentage of patients with “textbook outcome†), and surgery-specific information (e.g., possibility for minimally invasive procedure). Hierarchial Bayes estimation was used to estimate the utilities for each attribute level for each patient. Based on the ranges of these utilities, the relative importance of each hospital attribute was determined for each participant as a measure of the impact on patients’ choices. Results : 308 (46.3%) questionnaires were available for analysis. Of the hospital attributes that patients considered, surgery-specific information on average had the highest relative importance (25.7 [23.9–27.5]), regardless of gender, age, and education. Waiting time and hospital atmosphere were considered least important. The attribute concerning the percentage of patients with “textbook outcomes†had the second greatest impact (18.3 [16.9–19.6]), which was similar for patients with different adverse outcome experience. Conclusions : Surgery-specific and quality of care information are more important than general information when patients choose between hospitals.

Keywords: quality of care; surgery; performance measurement; choice-based conjoint analyses; patient choice; hospital comparison (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X10386799 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:medema:v:31:y:2011:i:6:p:816-827

DOI: 10.1177/0272989X10386799

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Medical Decision Making
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().