Randomized Trial of Risk Information Formats in Direct-to-Consumer Prescription Drug Advertisements

Kathryn J. Aikin, Amie C. O’Donoghue, John L. Swasy and Helen W. Sullivan

Medical Decision Making, 2011, vol. 31, issue 6, E23-E33

Abstract: Background . Federal regulations specify that print advertisements for prescription drugs and biological products must provide a true statement of information “in brief summary†about each advertised product’s “side effects, contraindications, and effectiveness.†Some of the current approaches to fulfilling the brief summary requirement, although adequate from a regulatory perspective, result in ads that may be difficult to read and understand when used in consumer-directed promotion. Objective . To explore ways in which the brief summary might be improved. Design . The authors conducted an experimental study that examined 300 consumers’ (mall visitors ever told that they were overweight) understanding of and preference for 4 different brief summary formats: traditional (a plain-language version of the risk sections from professional labeling), question and answer (Q&A; with headings framed in the form of questions), highlights (a summary section from revised professional labeling), and prescription drug facts box (similar to the current over-the-counter drug facts label). Results . The format had several effects. For instance, participants who viewed the drug facts format were better able to recall risks ( P

Keywords: randomized trial methodology; risk factor evaluation; population based studies; scale development/validation. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X11413289 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:medema:v:31:y:2011:i:6:p:e23-e33

DOI: 10.1177/0272989X11413289

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Medical Decision Making
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().