Using Dual Beta Distributions to Create “Proper†ROC Curves Based on Rating Category Data

Douglas Mossman and Hongying Peng

Medical Decision Making, 2016, vol. 36, issue 3, 349-365

Abstract: Background: Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis helps investigators quantify and describe how well a diagnostic system discriminates between 2 mutually exclusive conditions. The conventional binormal (CvB) curve-fitting model usually produces ROCs that are improper in that they do not have the ever-decreasing slope required by signal detection theory. When data sets evaluated under the CvB model have hooks, the resulting ROCs can contain misleading information about the diagnostic performance of the method at low and high false positive rates. Objective: To present and evaluate a dual beta (DB) ROC model that assumes diagnostic data arise from 2 β distributions. The DB model’s parameter constraints assure that the resulting ROC curve has a positive, monotonically decreasing slope. Design/Method: Computer simulation study comparing results from CvB, DB, and weighted power function (WPF) models. Results: The DB model produces results that are as good as or better than those from the WPF model, and less biased and closer to the true values than curves obtained using the CvB model. Conclusions: The DB ROC model expresses the relationship between the false positive rate and true positive rate in closed form and allows for quick ROC area calculations using spreadsheet functions. Because it posits simple relationships among the decision axis, operating points, and model parameters, the DB model offers investigators a flexible, easy-to-grasp ROC form that is simpler to implement than other proper ROC models.

Keywords: receiver operating characteristic; proper ROC; binormal assumption; β; distribution (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X15582210 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:medema:v:36:y:2016:i:3:p:349-365

DOI: 10.1177/0272989X15582210

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Medical Decision Making
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().