Matching Microsimulation Risk Factor Correlations to Cross-sectional Data: The Shortest Distance Method

Sze-chuan Suen, Jeremy D. Goldhaber-Fiebert and Sanjay Basu
Additional contact information
Sze-chuan Suen: Epstein Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Jeremy D. Goldhaber-Fiebert: Stanford Health Policy, Centers for Health Policy and Primary Care and Outcomes Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
Sanjay Basu: Stanford Health Policy, Centers for Health Policy and Primary Care and Outcomes Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

Medical Decision Making, 2018, vol. 38, issue 4, 452-464

Abstract: Background. Microsimulation models often compute the distribution of a simulated cohort’s risk factors and medical outcomes over time using repeated waves of cross-sectional data. We sought to develop a strategy to simulate how risk factor values remain correlated over time within individuals, and compare it to available alternative methods. Methods. We developed a method using shortest-distance matching for modeling changes in risk factors in individuals over time, which preserves both the cohort distribution of each risk factor as well as the cross-sectional correlation between risk factors observed in repeated cross-sectional data. We compared the performance of the method with rank stability and regression methods, using both synthetic data and data from the Framingham Offspring Heart Study (FOHS) to simulate a cohort’s atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk. Results. The correlation between risk factors was better preserved using the shortest distance method than with rank stability or regression (root mean squared difference = 0.077 with shortest distance, v. 0.126 with rank stability and 0.146 with regression in FOHS, and 0.052, 0.426 and 0.352, respectively, in the synthetic data). The shortest distance method generated population ASCVD risk estimate distributions indistinguishable from the true distribution in over 99.8% of cases (Kolmogorov-Smirnov, P > 0.05), outperforming some existing regression methods, which produced ASCVD distributions statistically distinguishable from the true one at the 5% level around 15% of the time. Limitations. None of the methods considered could predict individual longitudinal trends without error. The shortest-distance method was not statistically inferior to rank stability or regression methods for predicting individual risk factor values over time in the FOHS. Conclusions. A shortest distance method may assist in preserving risk factor correlations in microsimulations informed by cross-sectional data.

Keywords: biomarker estimation; microsimulations; repeated cross sections (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X17741635 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:medema:v:38:y:2018:i:4:p:452-464

DOI: 10.1177/0272989X17741635

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Medical Decision Making
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().