Reducing Uncertainty in EQ-5D Value Sets: The Role of Spatial Correlation

Shahriar Shams and Eleanor Pullenayegum
Additional contact information
Shahriar Shams: Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
Eleanor Pullenayegum: Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Medical Decision Making, 2019, vol. 39, issue 2, 91-99

Abstract: Objective . Scoring algorithms for the EQ-5D-3L are constructed subject to a large degree of uncertainty (a credible interval width of 0.152, which is significant in comparison to the reported minimal important differences). The purpose of this work is to explore modeling techniques that will reduce the extent of this uncertainty. Methods . We used the US valuation study data. A Bayesian approach was used to calculate predicted utilities and credible intervals. A spatial Gaussian correlation structure was used to model correlation among health states (HS), thus allowing directly valued HS to contribute to the predicted utility of nearby unvalued HS. Leave-one-out cross-validation was used to compare model performances. Results . The average posterior standard deviation was 0.039 for the unvalued health states and 0.011 for the valued health states. Using cross-validation, the US D1 model had 31% coverage probability. Models with independent and Gaussian correlation had coverage probabilities of 95% and 93%, respectively. Moreover, the Gaussian correlation structure resulted in a 25.6% reduction in mean squared error (SE) and 13.2% reduction in mean absolute error (AE) compared to the independent correlation structure (mean SE of 0.00131 v. 0.00176 and mean AE of 0.02818 v. 0.03248). Conclusion . Uncertainty was substantially lower for the directly valued HS compared to unvalued HS, suggesting direct valuation of as many health states as possible. Incorporation of a spatial correlation significantly reduced uncertainty. Hence, we suggest incorporating this when constructing scoring algorithms.

Keywords: Bayesian methods; health utility; model misspecification; parameter uncertainty; spatial correlation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X18821368 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:medema:v:39:y:2019:i:2:p:91-99

DOI: 10.1177/0272989X18821368

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Medical Decision Making
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().