The Effect of Expert Feedback on Antibiotic Prescribing in Pediatrics: Experimental Evidence
Kerstin Eilermann,
Katrin Halstenberg,
Ludwig Kuntz,
Kyriakos Martakis,
Bernhard Roth and
Daniel Wiesen
Additional contact information
Kerstin Eilermann: Cologne Graduate School in Management, Economics, and Social Sciences (CGS), Department of Business Administration and Health Care Management, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
Katrin Halstenberg: Medical Faculty and University Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
Ludwig Kuntz: Department of Business Administration and Health Care Management, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
Kyriakos Martakis: Medical Faculty and University Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
Bernhard Roth: Medical Faculty and University Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
Daniel Wiesen: Department of Business Administration and Health Care Management, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
Medical Decision Making, 2019, vol. 39, issue 7, 781-795
Abstract:
Background. Inappropriate prescribing of antibiotics, which is common in pediatric care, is a key driver of antimicrobial resistance. To mitigate the development of resistance, antibiotic stewardship programs often suggest the inclusion of feedback targeted at individual providers. Empirically, however, it is not well understood how feedback affects individual physicians’ antibiotic prescribing decisions. Also, the question of how physicians’ characteristics, such as clinical experience, relate to antibiotic prescribing decisions and to responses to feedback is largely unexplored. Objective. To analyze the causal effect of descriptive expert feedback (and individual characteristics) on physicians’ antibiotic prescribing decisions in pediatrics. Design. We employed a randomized, controlled framed field experiment, in which German pediatricians ( n =73) decided on the length of first-line antibiotic treatment for routine pediatric cases. In the intervention group ( n =39), pediatricians received descriptive feedback in form of an expert benchmark, which allowed them to compare their own prescribing decisions with expert recommendations. The recommendations were elicited in a survey of pediatric department directors ( n =20), who stated the length of antibiotic therapies they would choose for the routine cases. Pediatricians’ characteristics were elicited in a comprehensive questionnaire. Results. Providing pediatricians with expert feedback significantly reduced the length of antibiotic therapies by 10% on average. Also, the deviation of pediatricians’ decisions from experts’ recommendations significantly decreased. Antibiotic therapy decisions were significantly related to pediatricians’ clinical experience, risk attitudes, and personality traits. The effect of feedback was significantly associated with physicians’ experience. Conclusion. Our results indicate that descriptive expert feedback can be an effective means to guide pediatricians, especially those who are inexperienced, toward more appropriate antibiotic prescribing. Therefore, it seems to be suitable for inclusion in antibiotic stewardship programs.
Keywords: clinical experience; descriptive feedback; expert benchmark; framed field experiment; length of antibiotic therapy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X19866699 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:medema:v:39:y:2019:i:7:p:781-795
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X19866699
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Medical Decision Making
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().